academic-paper-reviewer
academic-paper-reviewer is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by costrict-plugins-repo in the imbad0202-academic-research-skills-academic-research-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates academic-paper-reviewer C (73/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Multi-perspective academic paper review with dynamic reviewer personas. Simulates 5 independent reviewers (EIC + 3 peer reviewers + Devil's Advocate) with field-specific expertise. Supports full review, re-review (verification), quick assessment, methodology focus, Socratic guided, and calibration modes. Triggers on: review paper, peer review, manuscript review, referee report, review my paper, critique paper, simulate review, editorial review, calibrate reviewer, reviewer calibration, measure reviewer accuracy.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 73 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 27
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
View source on GitHubcostrict-plugins-repo/imbad0202-academic-research-skills-academic-research-skills
Our review
- Architecture
- 97 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 1 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.