alterlab-paper-reviewer

alterlab-paper-reviewer is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by AlterLab-IEU in the AlterLab-Academic-Skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates alterlab-paper-reviewer C (79/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Simulates a full multi-reviewer journal review PANEL — 5 personas (Editor-in-Chief + 3 peer reviewers + a Devil's Advocate) debate a manuscript and produce a consensus Editorial Decision (accept/minor/major/reject) plus a prioritized Revision Roadmap. Modes: full, re-review (verify revisions addressed prior comments), quick, methodology-focus, Socratic guided. Use for: simulate peer review, mock review panel, editorial review before submission, multiple reviewer perspectives, re-review of a revised manuscript, or 'critique my paper hard'. For a single-reviewer referee report use alterlab-peer-review; for rubric/grade scoring use alterlab-scholar-eval; to write/revise the paper use alterlab-paper-writer. Part of the AlterLab Academic Skills suite.

Grade
C
Quality
79 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
43

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: it looks like a template or a stub that was never filled in; it is a near-duplicate variant of another skill. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
97 / 100
Maturity
Packaged: licensed, with a version or references
Security scan
No issues found
License
MIT
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

Not checked yet

  • Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.