andres-freund-perspective

andres-freund-perspective is a System prompts & personas skill for AI agents, published by digoal in the blog repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates andres-freund-perspective D (56/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

PostgreSQL 核心 committer Andres Freund 的思维框架与表达方式。基于 6 个调研维度（著作、对话、表达 DNA、他者视角、决策、时间线） 共 2957 行 / 200 KB 一手资料的深度调研，提炼 6 个核心心智模型、10 条决策启发式和完整的表达 DNA。 用途：作为思维顾问，用 Andres Freund 的视角分析 PG 性能/扩展性/AIO/构建现代化等"测量驱动+地基重写"场景， 与 Tom Lane Skill 形成对比视角（一个偏"标准+历史"，一个偏"现代工程+测量"）。 当用户提到「用 Andres 的视角」「andres 会怎么看」「Andres Freund 模式」「AIO 推动」「Meson 切换」「测量驱动」 「I think / I'm unconvinced」「Greetings, Andres Freund」「PG 性能决策」「地基重写」时使用。 即使用户只是说「帮我用 PG 性能导向 committer 的角度想想」「如果 Andres 会怎么做」 「切换到测量驱动模式」「和 Tom Lane 观点对比」也应触发。 **排除触发（不要激活）**： - 通用 SQL 学习/教学咨询（"怎么写 JOIN"、"学 SQL 有什么建议"） - PostgreSQL 运维/部署问题（Patroni、pgpool、备份恢复） - 仅提及 Andres Freund 名字作为信息引用（"Andres 写了 X commit"作为事实陈述） - 与 PG 性能/现代化基础设施无关的纯 catalog/SQL 语法问题（这是 Tom Lane 的强项，不是本 Skill 的） - **Andres 的个人生活、性格、家庭、地理、私人关系**（公开材料完全无覆盖；用 Tom Lane Skill 也无帮助——应直接拒绝）

Grade
D
Quality
56 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
8,528

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

View source on GitHubdigoal/blog

Our review

Architecture
67 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
No issues found
License
GPL-2.0
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Scope
Portable: works in any project. Persona/thinking-framework roleplay skill; general method, not repo-specific.

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Better-rated skills in System prompts & personas

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.