architecture-as-code-python
architecture-as-code-python is a Codebase structure & module boundaries skill for AI agents, published by l-gevity in the l-gevity-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates architecture-as-code-python F (45/100) and the safety scan rated it risky; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Risky. This skill has patterns associated with unsafe behaviour. Read the source carefully before running it.
Python implementation of the `architecture-as-code` pattern. Per-package `architecture.toml` files merged into a single `import-linter` config and enforced via `lint-imports` (over a Grimp-built import graph). TRIGGER when: implementing or extending architecture-as-code in a Python repo, debugging an `import-linter` contract, or adapting the assembler. SKIP for routine edits inside a governed package. Reads in conjunction with `architecture-as-code` (the pattern, source of truth for schema, rule placement, anti-patterns, and audit checklist) — this skill defines only the Python-specific encoding, assembler code, and gotchas.
- Grade
- F
- Quality
- 45 / 100
- Safety
- Risky
- GitHub stars
- 20
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since.
Our review
- Architecture
- 82 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- High-risk patterns
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
What the scanner flagged
- executes shell/subprocess
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.