benchmarking-clinical-ner
benchmarking-clinical-ner is a Model training & evaluation skill for AI agents, published by maziyarpanahi in the openmed repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates benchmarking-clinical-ner C (70/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Score an OpenMed clinical or biomedical NER model against a user-supplied gold corpus with entity-level precision, recall, and F1, then break errors down per label. Use when the user wants a seqeval-style scorecard, strict vs partial (relaxed) span matching, a per-label confusion matrix, false-negative / false-positive examples, or to debug why a model misses entities. Trigger on "evaluate NER", "entity-level F1", "seqeval", "precision recall F1", "confusion matrix", "error analysis", "strict vs partial match", or "score against gold" in an OpenMed context. The gold corpus is user-supplied; OpenMed bundles no i2b2/n2c2/MIMIC data.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 70 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 4,654
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 100 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- Low-risk patterns
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
- Scope
- Vendor-specific: built around one product. Evaluating public OpenMed NER models; useful to any OpenMed user
What the scanner flagged
- mentions secrets in text
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.