build-technical-explainer
build-technical-explainer is a Design-to-code & prototyping skill for AI agents, published by yuki-yano in the dotfiles repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates build-technical-explainer C (76/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
調査・監査・技術選定比較・性能検証・実装結果について、ユーザーが「結果をHTMLで読みやすく整理して」「HTMLの説明資料・レポートとして残して」のように、後から読み返せる静的HTML成果物を求めたときに使う。説明を補助する表、限定的な図解・定量グラフ・折りたたみ・定型指摘フィルタにも対応する。内容の調査・整理を伴わないHTML断片への変換、UI案や配色の比較モック、スライド、単体の探索的グラフ、任意JavaScriptを要する対話ツールには使わない。
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 76 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 65
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: it looks written only for the repository it lives in. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 91 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.