ccf-paper-reviewer
ccf-paper-reviewer is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by mikubaka88 in the CCFA-Skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates ccf-paper-reviewer C (74/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Review CCF/target-venue manuscripts end to end: scientific novelty, soundness, evidence, simulated reviewers, AC/meta-review, score risk, writing logic, paragraph clarity, LaTeX/format presentation, and reviewer-facing revision actions. Use for paper review, scientific review, writing review, format review, 审稿, 模拟审稿, 论文评分, 写作评审, 逐段评审, LaTeX检查. Do not rewrite the manuscript as the main task and do not write rebuttals.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 74 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 892
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: a model that read it found it written only for the repository it lives in. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 100 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
- Scope
- Repo-internal: written for the repository it lives in. Depends on this skill suite's own ccf-common shared references.
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.