chapter-defect-diagnose
chapter-defect-diagnose is a Books & long-form publishing skill for AI agents, published by xiaolai in the no-one-did-it repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates chapter-defect-diagnose C (71/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Diagnose a chapter against the 10 reader-experience values in rule 12 (5 core + 5 craft) and build a defect map naming which values fail, with cited prose evidence, and recommending one of the five treatment classes from rule 08. Output is `process/defect-map/<n>-<slug>.md` plus a treatment-class row appended to `book/registries/treatment-classes.yml`.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 71 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 81
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: it is a near-duplicate variant of another skill; it looks written only for the repository it lives in. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 94 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.