ci-cd-supply-chain-attack

ci-cd-supply-chain-attack is a Penetration testing & red team skill for AI agents, published by brucesongs in the kali-claw repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates ci-cd-supply-chain-attack F (45/100) and the safety scan rated it risky; the rating is based on static analysis only.

CI/CD pipeline and software supply chain compromise covering Jenkins (script console, Jenkinsfile injection, shared library abuse, CVE-2024-23897 args4j), GitLab CI/CD (runner abuse, .gitlab-ci.yml injection, self-hosted runner takeover, CVE-2022-1162, OmniAuth CVE-2024-9653), GitHub Actions (self-hosted runner abuse, pull_request_target trap, workflow injection via issue/PR title, secrets exfiltration via cache/artifact, GITHUB_TOKEN scope), CircleCI (context theft, OIDC abuse), Argo CD (CVE-2022-24348, default app creds), Flux CD (GitRepository CRD abuse), Tekton, Buildkite, Drone CI, software supply chain attacks (dependency confusion, typosquatting, brandjacking, malicious npm/PyPI packages, SBOM/SLSA, Sigstore/cosign, in-toto, S2C2F), notable incidents (SolarWinds SUNBURST, 3CX, Codecov, xz-utils CVE-2024-3094, event-stream, ua-parser-js), and detection/defense tooling (StepSecurity Harden-Runner, OpenSSF Scorecard, Socket, Sonatype Nexus, Snyk, Anchore Syft/Grype, KICS, Checkov,…

Grade
F
Quality
45 / 100
Safety
Risky
GitHub stars
39

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since.

Our review

Architecture
87 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
High-risk patterns
License
MIT
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

What the scanner flagged

  • exfiltration language
  • references sensitive credential env
  • accesses sensitive system files
  • reads environment variables
  • mentions secrets in text

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.