code-review
code-review is a Change & PR review skill for AI agents, published by testdouble in the han repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates code-review C (73/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Run a comprehensive code review on local source files. Use this skill when the user asks to review, audit, inspect, evaluate, or check code, even if they never use the word "review." Does not post comments to GitHub pull requests — use post-code-review-to-pr for that. Does not analyze architectural structure or module boundaries — use architectural-analysis for that. Does not explain code or a PR to build understanding before reviewing — use code-overview for that. Does not capture feedback on Han's own skills — use han-feedback for that.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 73 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 119
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: it is a near-duplicate variant of another skill. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 94 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- Low-risk patterns
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
What the scanner flagged
- over-broad allowed-tools ('*')
- mentions secrets in text
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.