comment-review

comment-review is a Change & PR review skill for AI agents, published by Stirling-Tools in the Stirling-PDF repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates comment-review D (55/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Review and improve the code comments a PR or branch adds, against the standard in devGuide/CODE_COMMENTS.md: cut the ones that restate the code, tighten the verbose ones, reframe what-comments into the why or the constraint, and add the contract docs the change left missing. Runs comment-lint for the mechanical rules first, then judges what a linter cannot: padding around one real fact, facts already stated by a type or a name, comments that will go stale on the next unrelated change, and new public surfaces left undocumented. Applies comment-only edits and reports every verdict in chat. Use when asked to review, clean up, trim, thin out or improve the comments on a PR or branch, to strip AI-looking narration before requesting review, or when comment-lint findings need judgment rather than a mechanical fix. Pass --report-only to change nothing.

Grade
D
Quality
55 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
91,889

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
76 / 100
Maturity
Basic: a single SKILL.md
Security scan
No issues found
License
Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.

Not checked yet

  • Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.