comparative-network-toxicology-shared-mechanism-reference-grounded

comparative-network-toxicology-shared-mechanism-reference-grounded is a Literature review & citations skill for AI agents, published by aipoch in the medical-research-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates comparative-network-toxicology-shared-mechanism-reference-grounded C (76/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Generates complete comparative network-toxicology research designs from a user-provided exposure pair, shared toxic phenotype, and validation direction. Use when a study centers on two related exposures under one outcome and needs target collection, shared-vs-specific target decomposition, enrichment, PPI hub prioritization, docking, optional transcriptomic cross-checks, and conservative mechanistic synthesis. Covers five study patterns and always outputs Lite / Standard / Advanced / Publication+ with a recommended primary plan, stepwise workflow, figure plan, validation hierarchy, minimal executable version, publication upgrade path, and strictly verified literature retrieval.

Grade
C
Quality
76 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
1,449

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: it is a near-duplicate variant of another skill. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
91 / 100
Maturity
Packaged: licensed, with a version or references
Security scan
No issues found
License
MIT
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 2 collections

Not checked yet

  • Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.