coverage-analysis
coverage-analysis is a Penetration testing & red team skill for AI agents, published by microsoft in the testfx repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates coverage-analysis D (60/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Project-wide code coverage and CRAP (Change Risk Anti-Patterns) score analysis for .NET projects. Calculates CRAP scores per method and surfaces risk hotspots — complex code with low coverage that is dangerous to modify. Use to diagnose why coverage is stuck or plateaued, identify what methods block improvement, or get project-wide coverage analysis with risk ranking. USE FOR: coverage stuck, coverage plateau, can't increase coverage, what's blocking coverage, coverage gap, CRAP scores, risk hotspots, where to add tests, coverage analysis, coverage report. DO NOT USE FOR: targeted single-method CRAP analysis (use crap-score), writing tests, running tests without coverage, or troubleshooting test execution (use run-tests).
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 60 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 1,043
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 74 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.