design-evaluation
design-evaluation is an Unclassified skill for AI agents, published by Abhinavbwj in the Urban-Design-Skills-Claude repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates design-evaluation D (56/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Evaluate urban designs against comprehensive criteria drawn from all major global standards, certification systems, and theoretical frameworks. Generates detailed scorecards and improvement recommendations. Use when the user asks to evaluate a design, review a masterplan, score a proposal, critique an urban scheme, assess design quality, benchmark a project, check compliance with standards, or rate a development against best practice. Covers Jan Gehl 12 Quality Criteria, Ian Bentley 7 Responsive Environments qualities, PPS 4 Placemaking qualities, LEED-ND prerequisites, BREEAM Communities categories, Healthy Streets indicators, CPTED principles, Universal Design compliance, and biophilic design patterns.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 56 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 115
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 74 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- Low-risk patterns
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
What the scanner flagged
- mentions secrets in text
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.