figure-style

figure-style is a Scientific data analysis & plotting skill for AI agents, published by Boom5426 in the Nature-Paper-Skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates figure-style F (45/100) and the safety scan rated it risky; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Publication-grade figure correctness and legibility rules for final-deliverable figures — not every plot. Quick look or iterating on the analysis (EDA scatters, sanity-check histograms)? Plot plainly without this skill. Producing a figure that ships — report, paper, export, or kept artifact — load this skill first and call `apply_figure_style()` — sets a role-mapped font-size ladder, outward ticks, frameless legends, and 300-dpi output. The skill is a checklist, not a house look: data fidelity (claim-titles tested against every row, excluded data never enters summaries), label economy (floor and ceiling), color threading, chart-choice-by-data-shape, layout, and a render-then-verify QA loop (bbox collision + per-panel perceptual check). Ships helpers: focal_palette, bar_with_points, strip_with_median, end_of_line_labels, panel_letter, set_frame, panel_crops. For figure planning (one claim per figure, panel roles) use `figure-planner`; for the full Nature figure production workflow use…

Grade
F
Quality
45 / 100
Safety
Risky
GitHub stars
363

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since.

Our review

Architecture
96 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
High-risk patterns
License
MIT
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

What the scanner flagged

  • dynamic code execution (eval/exec)

Not checked yet

  • Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.