gap-to-topic
gap-to-topic is a Literature review & citations skill for AI agents, published by WenyuChiou in the research-hub repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates gap-to-topic D (68/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Turn a research area into a go/no-go decision dossier for ONE candidate thesis/proposal topic — a 3-gate verdict (is the gap open? is it a contribution? is it feasible?) with the evidence laid out so the researcher can verify it. Use when the user asks "is this gap worth pursuing", "help me pick a thesis topic", "is this idea already taken", "find me a defensible research gap", "vet this research idea before I commit", or "should I do this". NOT a literature review (use `literature-triage-matrix` for a comparison matrix) and NOT a study design (use `research-design-helper` once a topic is chosen). Produces a `.research/topic_dossier.md`, a `.research/topic_dossier.docx` (Word, colour-coded), a `.bib`, and a `.gaps.yml`.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 68 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 54
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 100 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.