github-issues

github-issues is an Issues & backlog tracking skill for AI agents, published by breimanntools in the aaanalysis repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates github-issues C (72/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Audit all open GitHub issues for the aaanalysis package against its scope and coding standards (CLAUDE.md + .claude/rules/sharp-edges.md), flagging each as ready / needs-revision / conflicts / already-addressed, detecting overlaps that must not be developed in parallel, and writing a prioritized step-by-step implementation plan to docs/guides/handoff_github_issues.md. Issues are the primary lens; pull requests are mapped in as secondary context — an "Issue ↔ PR activity" table (issues on the left, their PR(s) on the right, — when an issue has no PR) plus per-issue in-flight-PR notes so each issue and its PR are shown together. Use when the user wants to review, triage, audit, or scope GitHub issues or PRs, refresh the issue handoff, see what work is in flight, decide what to implement next, or plan parallel work across issues. Also use when the user wants to create a new GitHub issue to the house style guide — newly created issues are written to docs/guides/issue_style_guide.md and…

Grade
C
Quality
72 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
88

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: it is a near-duplicate variant of another skill. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
92 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
Low-risk patterns
License
BSD-3-Clause
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

What the scanner flagged

  • mentions secrets in text

Not checked yet

  • Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.