humanities-writing-companion
humanities-writing-companion is an Academic writing & papers skill for AI agents, published by tizzy916 in the humanities-writing-companion repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates humanities-writing-companion F (46/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Thinking partner for humanities scholars — history, philosophy, literature, art history, religious studies, classics, and adjacent fields where prose IS the argument. Covers the full arc of a paper: research-question sharpening, literature mapping, plan-only outlining, conception and drafting, four-layer chapter critique, calibratable devil's-advocate review, bottleneck unsticking, revision with voice preservation, blind reading, AI-use disclosure, and defense/reviewer-comment integration; audits in-draft citations against hallucination. Use when the user works on scholarly prose and mentions a paper, chapter, dissertation, research question, literature review, outline, reviewer attack, defense feedback, or AI disclosure — Chinese triggers: 论文, 改论文, 文献综述, 研究问题, 审稿人会怎么攻击, 答辩意见, 外审意见, 我手写我口 — or casually says 帮我看看这段 / 继续写 while an academic draft is in play. Not a research pipeline (no literature search), not a polishing tool (preserves the author's voice), not a citation manager.
- Grade
- F
- Quality
- 46 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 377
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 59 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.