inno-rebuttal
inno-rebuttal is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by OpenLAIR in the dr-claw repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates inno-rebuttal B (83/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Drafting and refining academic rebuttals for top-tier AI/CS conferences (NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR, CVPR, ECCV, AAAI, ARR, KDD, UAI, AISTATS, TMLR, etc.). Use this skill whenever the user needs to respond to reviewer comments, write a rebuttal, handle reviewer feedback, clarify technical misunderstandings, present additional experimental results, or deal with borderline accept/reject decisions. Also trigger when the user mentions keywords like "rebuttal", "reviewer", "review response", "author response", "camera-ready", "rebut", "AC", "area chair", "meta-review", or discusses conference review scores. Trigger for Chinese-language requests too, e.g. "写rebuttal", "回复审稿人", "审稿意见", "rebuttal怎么写", "reviewer说我的baseline不够".
- Grade
- B
- Quality
- 83 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 1,030
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 93 / 100
- Maturity
- Packaged: licensed, with a version or references
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 1 collections
- Scope
- Portable: works in any project. General academic rebuttal drafting for public conference venues
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.