issue-to-pr

issue-to-pr is a Bug triage & fixing skill for AI agents, published by JayFarei in the opentraces repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates issue-to-pr D (68/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Take one or more GitHub issues and drive each to a review-ready pull request, holding one belief throughout: an issue is a hypothesis, not a spec. The pipeline VERIFIES BEFORE IT TRUSTS and runs TWO ADVERSARIES before it commits: multi-agent investigation of the real cause (flagging any "landmine" — a cited function or file:line that does not exist) and the blast radius, a plan whose test must go RED BEFORE GREEN, two adversarial gates on that plan (a self/ethos checklist + a pure codex adversarial pass), implementation expressed as a forged `/goal` (via goal-forge) whose verify loop runs the otbox acceptance journey, a green suite + docs sync, a PR that `Closes #<n>`, and a FINAL codex adversarial review of the diff. Honesty, not theater: it reports unmet acceptance criteria and invalid issues rather than faking a fix. The human merges. Everything happens in a per-issue git worktree; multiple issues each get their own worktree + branch + PR. Use when the user says "issue-to-pr",…

Grade
D
Quality
68 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
89

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

View source on GitHubJayFarei/opentraces

Our review

Architecture
84 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
Low-risk patterns
License
Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

What the scanner flagged

  • mentions secrets in text

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Better-rated skills in Bug triage & fixing

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.