legal-norm-validity-check

legal-norm-validity-check is a Legal research & case law skill for AI agents, published by THUYRan in the Legal-Skills-Chinese repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates legal-norm-validity-check F (53/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

当AI智能体在法律推理过程中检索到具体法律条文后，需要对该法条进行效力验证时触发此技能。 触发条件包括但不限于： 1. 智能体引用任何法律条文作为推理依据前； 2. 用户提供法条要求分析其适用性时； 3. 多个法律规范可能存在冲突需要判断优先适用时； 4. 法律文件的时间效力存疑（可能已被修订、废止）时； 5. 需要确认某规范性文件是否具有法律约束力时； 6. 跨层级、跨区域法律规范适用产生疑问时。 本技能确保智能体引用的每一条法律规范均为现行有效、层级正确、与上位法及同位法无冲突， 从而保障法律推理结论的可靠性和权威性。

Grade
F
Quality
53 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
523

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

View source on GitHubTHUYRan/Legal-Skills-Chinese

Our review

Architecture
62 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
No issues found
License
Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Better-rated skills in Legal research & case law

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.