light-review-rebuttal
light-review-rebuttal is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by Light0305 in the Light-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates light-review-rebuttal C (77/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Build auditable peer-review revision and author-response packages for Light stage 13. Use after receiving reviewer comments, a decision or meta-review; when drafting a rebuttal or response letter; when triaging major/minor revisions; when simulating a pre-submission review; or when a rejection may require a user-chosen 13→3 novelty, 13→5 experiment, or 13→8 writing back-edge. Consumes the selected venue/context and real PDF facts, preserves reviewer wording, atomizes issues, binds claims/evidence/actions/provenance, separates PLANNED from DONE, checks current venue limits without borrowing another venue's rules, and emits the stage-13 gate without changing venue, manuscript, evidence, citations, figures, PDF, or passport automatically.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 77 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 445
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 94 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
- Scope
- Portable: works in any project. General peer-review rebuttal workflow; self-contained, any researcher could adopt
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.