llm-judge-alignment

llm-judge-alignment is an LLM evaluation & observability skill for AI agents, published by latitude-dev in the eval-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates llm-judge-alignment C (72/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Use this skill when a developer wants to validate how well their LLM judge aligns with human judgment. Triggers on: "validate my LLM judge", "check if my judge is accurate", "my judge scores don't match human ratings", "calibrate my evaluator", "how reliable is my judge", "measure judge alignment", "test my eval", "check my judge against human labels", "is my judge any good", "validate my evaluator", "my judge is too strict", "my judge keeps missing failures". Takes a judge prompt and human-labeled examples, measures pass agreement rate and failure catch rate, identifies directional bias (too lenient or too strict), and walks the dev through targeted fixes until alignment meets a reliable threshold.

Grade
C
Quality
72 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
20

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
84 / 100
Maturity
Packaged: licensed, with a version or references
Security scan
No issues found
License
MIT
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.