nature-reviewer
nature-reviewer is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by Yuan1z0825 in the nature-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates nature-reviewer D (62/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Simulate a Nature-style reviewer assessment from the referee perspective rather than an author rebuttal. Use when the user wants a pre-submission review, reviewer report, peer-review style critique, novelty/significance/technical soundness assessment, reviewer-style manuscript evaluation, 审稿人视角评估, 预审稿意见, or Nature reviewer report. Return 3 reviewer reports plus a cross-review synthesis, grounded only in the local Nature reviewer source basis. Also trigger on general pre-submission review requests during academic writing even without the word "Nature", such as getting a mock peer review for any journal, critiquing a draft as a reviewer would, assessing novelty/rigor before submission, and Chinese phrasings like 审稿人视角、模拟审稿、预审、帮我审一下论文、投稿前自审、审稿意见模拟、找论文问题.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 62 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 28,910
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 78 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Adoption
- Adopted by 2 other repositories, in 2 collections
- Scope
- Portable: works in any project. General pre-submission peer-review simulation for manuscripts
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.