nsfc-qc
nsfc-qc is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by huangwb8 in the ChineseResearchLaTeX repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates nsfc-qc B (84/100) and it passed the safety scan; a judge model has also reviewed it.
当用户明确要求"标书QC/质量控制/润色前质检/引用真伪核查/篇幅与结构检查"时使用。对 NSFC 标书进行只读质量控制：并行多线程独立检查文风生硬、引用假引/错引风险、篇幅与章节分布、逻辑清晰度等，最终输出标准化 QC 报告；中间文件默认归档到 `project_root/.bensz-api/skills/nsfc-qc/{yyyy-mm-dd-hh-mm}/`，并兼容 legacy `.nsfc-qc/` 读取/清理。
- Grade
- B
- Quality
- 84 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 2,524
Placed #2 of 6 in the judged category final for Peer review & grants.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 94 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
- Scope
- Portable: works in any project. Generic NSFC grant-proposal QC methodology for any researcher.
Judge review
Placed #2 of 6 in the judged category final for Peer review & grants.
- Trigger
82 82 - Instructions
88 88 - Specificity
88 88 - Safety
85 85 - Disclosure
60 60 - Maintenance
82 82
A narrow but well-engineered read-only QC pipeline for NSFC proposals, with real scripts, an evidence-chain rule for citation checks, and a documented degradation path when parallel tooling is unavailable.
Not checked yet
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.