nsfc-qc
nsfc-qc is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by InternScience in the DrClaw repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates nsfc-qc B (84/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
当用户明确要求"标书QC/质量控制/润色前质检/引用真伪核查/篇幅与结构检查"时使用。对 NSFC 标书进行只读质量控制:并行多线程独立检查文风生硬、引用假引/错引风险、篇幅与章节分布、逻辑清晰度等,最终输出标准化 QC 报告;中间文件默认归档到“交付目录内的隐藏工作区(.nsfc-qc/)”,并兼容 legacy `.nsfc-qc/`。
- Grade
- B
- Quality
- 84 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 168
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Not launch-quality. It is graded B with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: it is a near-duplicate variant of another skill. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 94 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 1 collections
- Scope
- Portable: works in any project. General NSFC grant proposal quality control workflow
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.