opensearch-personalize-caching-strategies

opensearch-personalize-caching-strategies is a Backend performance & caching skill for AI agents, published by pproenca in the dot-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates opensearch-personalize-caching-strategies C (71/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Caching strategies in front of AWS OpenSearch (Elasticsearch) or AWS Personalize — search, recommenders, multi-recommender pages, anon vs logged-in traffic. Covers ROI decision (TPS/minProvisionedTPS, Zipf, amplification), key design (canonicalisation, cohort vs user, solution-version pinning, bucketing), personalisation boundary (anon/logged split, fan-out coalescing), strategies (cache-aside, refresh-ahead, write-through, batch precompute, L1+L2), TTL (volatility, soft/hard, jitter, event-driven invalidation), stampede protection (single-flight, XFetch, stale-while-revalidate, circuit breaker), observability (hit-rate, cost-per-1k, cardinality drift, log-replay), defensive caching (negative, Bloom filter), and tier composition (LRU, ElastiCache Redis, CloudFront, OpenSearch request/filter cache). Triggers on cache hit rate, Personalize throttling, stampede, single-flight, L1/L2, ElastiCache sizing. Complements opensearch-function-scoring-algorithms.

Grade
C
Quality
71 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
180

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
94 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
No issues found
License
MIT
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.