os-what-could-go-wrong
os-what-could-go-wrong is a Plan & work review gates skill for AI agents, published by kharmanskyi in the open-steps repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates os-what-could-go-wrong D (60/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
ALWAYS invoke this skill before anything hard to undo gets agreed to - a contract, a purchase, a migration, a launch, a price change, a reorganisation - and whenever the user asks "what could go wrong", "what are we missing", "poke holes in this", or for a premortem or a red team, in any language. Assumes the decision already failed and works backwards to find out why, in a fresh agent that had no hand in making it. Sweeps nine areas and shows what each produced, including the empty ones. Ends on one verdict: go ahead, go but fix these first, try it small first, think again, do not do this.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 60 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 196
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 82 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- Low-risk patterns
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
What the scanner flagged
- over-broad allowed-tools ('*')
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.