paper-anchor

paper-anchor is a Literature review & citations skill for AI agents, published by cabbage2000-lab in the paper-tutor-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates paper-anchor D (58/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

文献支撑补齐命令(论断—支撑对照器)。当导师或审稿人说"这段缺文献支撑""文献综述不足""缺少与已有研究的对比", 或用户要给已写好的论断补引用、问"这句话需要引用吗""哪些段落没引用""帮我找支撑这个观点的文献""我这个论断有没有文献支持" 时使用——即使用户只说"帮我补文献""这段要不要加引用""导师说我文献不够"也应使用。 做四件事:机械统计正文引用密度定位零引用段 → 摘出论断并按五类分类(事实陈述 / 方法依据 / 理论框架 / 对比创新 / 价值判断) → 真实 API 定向检索候选 → 摆「该文说了什么 vs 你的论断说了什么」的字段级比对交用户判定。 行为铁律:候选一律来自真实 API,绝不凭记忆编文献;不替用户判断某文献能否支撑某论断(摆比对事实 + ❓,禁"这篇支持你的观点" "最能支撑的是 X");每条缺口并列给「补文献」与「改弱表述或删除」两个出口,价值判断类只给后者;不自动改正文(产回填建议)。 "帮我找几篇撑一下这个观点别管对不对""找不到就编一条差不多的""直接把引用加到我正文里"走三段式转化或硬拒绝。

Grade
D
Quality
58 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
25

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
70 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
No issues found
License
Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.

Not checked yet

  • Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.