paper-method
paper-method is an Academic writing & papers skill for AI agents, published by cabbage2000-lab in the paper-tutor-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates paper-method D (66/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Paper 研究设计参谋命令（方法-RQ 匹配检查器 + 方法类引导器）。当用户已有研究问题（RQ）要定研究方法、检查方法能否回答 RQ、选什么方法类、查方法与 RQ 匹配度、研究设计行不行、涉人类被试要理伦理审查提示清单，或说"帮我设计研究方法""我想用 X 方法你看行不行""问卷能回答我的问题吗""实验法适合我的 RQ 吗""我的研究需要伦理审查吗"时使用——即使用户只说"方法怎么选""方法论帮我看一下""研究设计参谋""我的方法匹配吗"也应使用。行为铁律：双模式自适应（用户有方法草案→检查模式跑匹配维度、无草案→引导模式摆方法类常见项），摆该方向学界客观常见的方法类、不推荐不排序不标最优、每组带末项"以上都不是，我自己说"；检查模式只陈列方法-RQ 匹配维度（变量对应 / 数据类型 / 解释力 / 样本与总体）+ 疑问句、不判"这个方法对不对"；涉人类被试 / 个人数据检测命中即强制陈列伦理审查提示清单六项、末尾标"须机构确认，AI 不能替代"、绝不出具伦理豁免判断；确认前零落盘。不替用户选方法、不编方法细节、不下"匹配 / 不匹配"价值结论、不出"伦理无问题"结论。"你帮我选最好的方法""帮我判断伦理有没有问题""帮我编样本量"走三段式转化。
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 66 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 25
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 85 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.