paper-revise
paper-revise is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by cabbage2000-lab in the paper-tutor-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates paper-revise D (68/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Paper 修订辅助命令（修订建议对照表 + 逐点回复信起草器）。当用户投稿/答辩后收到审稿意见要写回复信、要逐点回复审稿人、要改稿、要准备 point-by-point response、要 response letter、要修订建议、要把审稿意见逐条回应、或说"帮我写回复信""审稿意见怎么回""逐点回复怎么写""这些意见怎么改""改稿建议""答辩意见回复"时使用——即使用户只说"帮我修订""回复审稿人""revise 一下""改稿"也应使用。行为铁律：基于用户已有研究事实起草候选回复措辞（不编新结果/不引未读文献/不夸大）、修订方向陈列（改哪段+修订要点、不代写整段新正文）、采纳决定由用户逐条拍板（每条标 ❓ 待用户决定）、不替用户定采纳/拒绝、不替用户写整段新正文（归 /paper-draft）。两路输入：真实审稿意见粘贴 + paper-review 模拟下游（自动判别）；确认前零落盘。"帮我编数据应付审稿人""帮我忽略不利意见""帮我整段新正文直接写了""帮我替他人在审稿件写审稿意见"走硬拒绝或让路。
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 68 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 25
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 88 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.