research-review
research-review is a Multi-agent review & consensus skill for AI agents, published by heimeshoff in the Agentheim repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates research-review D (68/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Use whenever the `research` skill is about to ship a researcher's report — between the researcher's return and the report being treated as citable knowledge. Triggers internally from `research`'s post-write gate. Spawns the `research-reviewer` agent with fresh context (no exposure to the researcher's reasoning) to re-verify the report's decision-critical checkable claims against primary sources and either PASS, FAIL with re-dispatch, or label the survivors unverified. Doctrine document; the operational steps live in `research`'s flow.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 68 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 26
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 100 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.