review-actual-pr

review-actual-pr is a Change & PR review skill for AI agents, published by actualbudget in the actual repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates review-actual-pr C (77/100) and it passed the safety scan; a judge model has also reviewed it.

Comprehensive review of a pull request in the actualbudget/actual repo. Performs an offline code review against the repo's CODE_REVIEW_GUIDELINES.md and AGENTS.md (no GitHub comments are ever posted), then browser-tests the change with playwright-cli. For bug PRs, reproduces the issue on edge.actualbudget.org first and verifies the fix on the Netlify preview; for feature/enhancement PRs, exercises the change on the preview and captures annotated screenshots highlighting the new functionality. Use whenever the user asks to review, test, validate, vet, sanity-check, QA, or otherwise look at a PR / pull request in the Actual Budget repo — including phrases like "review

Grade
C
Quality
77 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
27,556

Placed #1 of 6 in the judged category final for Change & PR review.

Not launch-quality. It is graded C with a clean safety verdict, but our quality filters exclude it: a model that read it found it written only for the repository it lives in. So it is not in our launch-quality set, the skills our MCP server searches and recommends. How launch-quality is decided

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
100 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
Low-risk patterns
License
MIT
Adoption
Adopted by 2 other repositories, in 0 collections
Scope
Repo-internal: written for the repository it lives in. Explicitly reviews PRs in the actualbudget/actual repo itself.

Judge review

Placed #1 of 6 in the judged category final for Change & PR review.

  • Trigger8888
  • Instructions9494
  • Specificity9696
  • Safety9797
  • Disclosure8888
  • Maintenance9090
Explicit hard bans on ever posting to the PR or touching the working tree, a git-identity check before anything GitHub-related, and a refusal to fabricate a reproduction when data is missing.

What the scanner flagged

  • over-broad allowed-tools ('*')

Not checked yet

  • No blind task eval yet
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.