review-topic-local-vs-remote-execution
review-topic-local-vs-remote-execution is an MLOps & model serving skill for AI agents, published by roboflow in the inference repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates review-topic-local-vs-remote-execution D (65/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Load when a PR touches how a step/model runs in-process vs. over the network: Workflow-block execution-mode dispatch (self._step_execution_mode, StepExecutionMode.LOCAL/REMOTE, run_locally/run_remotely), a block get_restrictions()/get_air_gapped_availability(), backend/runtime routing env (USE_INFERENCE_MODELS, DISABLED_INFERENCE_MODELS_BACKENDS, WORKFLOWS_REMOTE_API_TARGET, inference_models_adapters.py), CUDA/Jetson/ONNX gating, or a new block with network/LAN/same-process assumptions.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 65 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 2,377
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 94 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.