reviewing-ai-generated-code

reviewing-ai-generated-code is a Change & PR review skill for AI agents, published by leonasdev in the .dotfiles repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates reviewing-ai-generated-code D (61/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

深度 review 另一個 AI agent (Cursor, Copilot Agent, Gemini CLI, ChatGPT, 其他 Claude session 等) 或 AI-輔助同事完成的 code 變更，從 reviewer 角度驗證實作正確、能 work、品質達標。 觸發情境包含使用者說「同事用 AI 寫了 X，幫我 review」「另一個 AI 完成的，pull 下來看一下」 「幫我詳細 review 這個 branch / PR / commit」「我同事推了 code，幫我看」 「這是 Cursor / Copilot Agent 做的，幫我審查」「幫我 code review」、提到拉取一個分支或 PR 並要求審查、或附上與其他 AI 的對話紀錄、task spec 並要求驗證實作的場景。 重點是 AI agent 寫的 code 有特定失敗模式 (hallucinated APIs、silent fallback、表面合理但實際錯誤、 testing theater、spec drift、over-engineering)，這些跟人類寫的 code 不一樣，要用對應的方法檢查。 這個 skill 是 *reviewer 視角*——不是請別人 review 自己的 code (那是 requesting-code-review)， 也不是處理收到的 review (receiving-code-review)。 Leon 收到同事 push 上來的 AI-輔助 commit / PR 並請你 review 時，請主動使用此 skill，即使他沒 明確要求。

Grade
D
Quality
61 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
80

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

View source on GitHubleonasdev/.dotfiles

Our review

Architecture
76 / 100
Maturity
Structured: ships references or scripts
Security scan
No issues found
License
Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Better-rated skills in Change & PR review

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.