rigor-docs-review

rigor-docs-review is a Docs quality & drift control skill for AI agents, published by rigortype in the rigor repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates rigor-docs-review D (56/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.

Run the multi-lens review battery on Rigor's user-facing docs (docs/manual/ + docs/handbook/) as independent-context subagents, in five ordered layers: L0 mechanical (the permanent spec/docs/ gate), L1 semantic fidelity (claims vs the spec corpus / implementation / real CLI behaviour), L2 reader lenses (a Ruby-only reader with no static-typing background, procedure reproduction of the install + Rails-quickstart chapters, a Coming-from-X appendix reader), L3 bloat detection (inverted — flags fat not thin), L4 English copyedit + terminology and cross-reference hygiene. Parallel within a layer, sequential across; the LLM battery runs only when L0 is green; copyedit is always last. Records each lens to docs/notes/ and applies only necessary, axis-preserving fixes. Triggers: review the docs / manual / handbook, 査読して / 校閲して, validate a chapter before a milestone, check docs against the implementation. Not for a single typo. Software documentation, not a book — prose depth is not a virtue.

Grade
D
Quality
56 / 100
Safety
Passed
GitHub stars
82

Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.

Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.

This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.

Our review

Architecture
78 / 100
Maturity
Basic: a single SKILL.md
Security scan
No issues found
License
MPL-2.0
Adoption
Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections

Not checked yet

  • Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
  • No blind task eval yet
  • Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
  • Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only

Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.