rigor-docs-review
rigor-docs-review is a Docs quality & drift control skill for AI agents, published by rigortype in the rigor repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates rigor-docs-review D (56/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Run the multi-lens review battery on Rigor's user-facing docs (docs/manual/ + docs/handbook/) as independent-context subagents, in five ordered layers: L0 mechanical (the permanent spec/docs/ gate), L1 semantic fidelity (claims vs the spec corpus / implementation / real CLI behaviour), L2 reader lenses (a Ruby-only reader with no static-typing background, procedure reproduction of the install + Rails-quickstart chapters, a Coming-from-X appendix reader), L3 bloat detection (inverted — flags fat not thin), L4 English copyedit + terminology and cross-reference hygiene. Parallel within a layer, sequential across; the LLM battery runs only when L0 is green; copyedit is always last. Records each lens to docs/notes/ and applies only necessary, axis-preserving fixes. Triggers: review the docs / manual / handbook, 査読して / 校閲して, validate a chapter before a milestone, check docs against the implementation. Not for a single typo. Software documentation, not a book — prose depth is not a virtue.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 56 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 82
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 78 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- MPL-2.0
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.