scholar-lit-review-hypothesis
scholar-lit-review-hypothesis is a Literature review & citations skill for AI agents, published by joshzyj in the open-scholar-skill repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates scholar-lit-review-hypothesis D (60/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Conduct a systematic literature review AND develop theory and hypotheses in one integrated workflow. Use when the user wants to map existing knowledge, identify gaps, select theoretical frameworks that address those gaps, specify mechanisms, and derive testable hypotheses — producing a publication-ready Literature Review and Theory section. Works best after /scholar-idea. Replaces running /scholar-lit-review and /scholar-hypothesis separately.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 60 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 102
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 74 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.