scholar-respond
scholar-respond is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by joshzyj in the open-scholar-skill repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates scholar-respond F (54/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Simulate peer review, draft point-by-point responses to reviewer comments, revise a manuscript, plan a resubmission to a new journal after rejection, or write an R&R cover letter. 5 modes — simulate (3–4 parallel journal-calibrated reviewer agents + severity matrix + revision roadmap), respond (categorized triage dashboard + point-by-point letter + changes summary table), revise (word-budget-tracked section edits via /scholar-write), resubmit (rejection diagnosis + journal retargeting + cover letter), cover-letter (standalone R&R or resubmission cover letter). Supports multi-round R&R tracking. Saves response letter, revision plan, and cover letter to disk.
- Grade
- F
- Quality
- 54 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 102
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 63 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.