sci-extract
sci-extract is a Literature review & citations skill for AI agents, published by ShZhao27208 in the Aut_Sci_Write repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates sci-extract C (73/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Read an academic paper end to end and extract professional research insights, figures, metadata, and critique. Use this skill whenever the user shares a scientific paper, review paper, survey paper, systematic review, meta-analysis, scoping review, arXiv link, DOI, PDF, or pasted paper text and asks to read, summarize, analyze, extract, digest, review, critique, or explain it. For original research papers, produce a modified Heilmeier analysis. For review literature, produce a field-map extraction covering scope, taxonomy, evidence quality, consensus, controversies, gaps, and future directions. Do NOT use this skill for non-academic articles, blog posts, or news.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 73 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 163
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 93 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- Low-risk patterns
- License
- Not declared. Check the repository before reusing it.
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
What the scanner flagged
- mentions secrets in text
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.