scientific-critical-thinking
scientific-critical-thinking is a Literature review & citations skill for AI agents, published by foryourhealth111-pixel in the Vibe-Skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates scientific-critical-thinking C (77/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Evaluate scientific claims and evidence quality. Use for assessing experimental design validity, identifying biases and confounders, applying evidence grading frameworks (GRADE, Cochrane Risk of Bias), or teaching critical analysis. Best for understanding evidence quality, identifying flaws. For formal peer review writing use peer-review.
- Grade
- C
- Quality
- 77 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 2,381
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 93 / 100
- Maturity
- Packaged: licensed, with a version or references
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- Apache-2.0
- Adoption
- Adopted by 2 other repositories, in 4 collections
- Scope
- Portable: works in any project. General evidence appraisal frameworks like GRADE and Cochrane
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Also published in 1 other repo
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.