scientific-reviewer
scientific-reviewer is a Peer review & grants skill for AI agents, published by jkitchin in the skillz repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates scientific-reviewer D (62/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Comprehensive scientific document review and analysis. Use when Claude needs to review scientific papers, reports, preprints, or other research documents for: (1) Identifying and evaluating claims and supporting evidence, (2) Assessing logical argumentation and experimental design, (3) Reviewing citation adequacy and suggesting additional references, (4) Determining document type and research contribution, (5) Checking technical accuracy and methodology, (6) Providing constructive feedback on presentation and clarity. Also handles language, grammar, and formatting review separately.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 62 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 31
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 84 / 100
- Maturity
- Structured: ships references or scripts
- Security scan
- Low-risk patterns
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
What the scanner flagged
- over-broad allowed-tools ('*')
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.