tradeoff-analysis
tradeoff-analysis is a UX design & wireframing skill for AI agents, published by Owl-Listener in the inclusive-design-skills repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates tradeoff-analysis D (68/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Analyse accessibility tradeoffs when a design decision improves accessibility for one group but may affect another, or when accessibility competes with other requirements. Use when facing conflicting accessibility needs, business pressure to reduce accessibility scope, or technical constraints that limit accessibility options. Triggers on: tradeoff, trade-off, compromise, accessibility vs performance, accessibility vs deadline, conflicting needs, which users, who do we prioritise, can't do both, accessibility scope.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 68 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 82
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 100 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 1 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.