tsa-constraints
tsa-constraints is a System design & architecture decisions skill for AI agents, published by aimasteracc in the tree-sitter-analyzer repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates tsa-constraints D (66/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Architectural constraint enforcement. Detect forbidden cross-module calls ("MCP must not depend on CLI") at index time and gate edits on them. Rules live in YAML at repo root; violations bubble up through edit action=safe and edit action=impact as UNSAFE verdicts. Use when: - User asks "does this PR break architecture?" - Pre-merge gate: "any forbidden edges?" - User wants to ADD a new architectural rule - You see a verdict=UNSAFE and want to understand why - Onboarding: "what are the architectural rules of this repo?" Replaces: tribal-knowledge architecture reviews + manual import audits (~5-15k tokens) with 1 MCP call (~200 tokens) + a YAML file (the rules).
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 66 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 43
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 84 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- MIT
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
Not checked yet
- Category is a classifier prediction; no model has read this skill yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Scope (portable / vendor / repo-internal) not assessed; only the top of each category is read for scope
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.