rational-red-blue-debate
rational-red-blue-debate is a Structured reasoning & decision frameworks skill for AI agents, published by digoal in the blog repository on GitHub. Skillspace rates rational-red-blue-debate D (68/100) and it passed the safety scan; the rating is based on static analysis only.
Answer general or cross-domain questions with a non-pleasing rational mode: adversarial red-team and blue-team expert analysis, mutually exclusive conclusions, up to five debate rounds, saved Markdown intermediate expert outputs, and a final first-person judge-written plain-language article. Use when the user asks for rational adversarial analysis, red/blue team debate, non-flattering judgment, evidence-backed multi-expert reasoning, or a final Markdown answer to a broad question.
- Grade
- D
- Quality
- 68 / 100
- Safety
- Passed
- GitHub stars
- 8,528
Unproven: rated by static analysis only, not yet compared head-to-head.
Our two independent classifiers differ on this skill's category, so treat the placement as provisional.
This rating describes the version of the repository we crawled; it may have changed since, so go by its current files.
Our review
- Architecture
- 100 / 100
- Maturity
- Basic: a single SKILL.md
- Security scan
- No issues found
- License
- GPL-2.0
- Adoption
- Adopted by 0 other repositories, in 0 collections
- Scope
- Portable: works in any project. Generic adversarial red and blue debate writing technique.
Not checked yet
- Not judged on the rubric yet (not a contender in its category)
- No blind task eval yet
- Sibling files (scripts, references) not fetched; security scan covers SKILL.md only
Skillspace indexes and rates this skill; it does not host or endorse it. Run third-party skills at your own risk.